web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Power Platform Community / Forums / Power Apps / Ai Builder Prediction ...
Power Apps
Unanswered

Ai Builder Prediction model performance - High Score & Testing

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 6

Hi, just looking for some recommendations in relation to testing with the Ai builder. I'm currently using the Prediction Model with some Timesheet entries used to track the length of time worked per project. These are broken down into days, time, client, project, work done and user performing the work. 

We use a field called, "Is Correct Rate," as a yes/no field, which I've current set the model to use for predicting future outcomes and use the below fields to influence the data: 

  1. Billable Rate
  2. Project
  3. Team Member
  4. Task
  5. Client

Currently, every test I run outputs a score of 98-99%, being run on a data set of 6000+ records and based on some initial testing, is working incorrectly and marking every "Is Correct Rate," field of new records as false. Billable Rate seems to stay consistently as the most influential field.  

Any recommendations in regards to why this would constantly score 98-99% and any information with split testing and training to train the Ai builder more relevantly? Thanks in advanced for any info anyone can provide here. 

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • Norah Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    Thank you for bringing up this issue.

     

    As we discussed, you kept seeing high training score because the training dataset you provided is very imbalanced towards the positive end. And this is not asking you to change anything on your training data to make it more balanced. We would like you to keep using dataset that could represent your production data distribution. And AI Builder team is already aware of the issue that Accuracy isn't a good measurement for imbalanced training set. We will soon release a new grading system to measure your model performance which could cover both balanced dataset and imbalanced. And you can decide whether or not to use that model based on it's grade, is it an A, B, C or D model (A is the best, and D would most likely require you to fix some issue).

     

    And for this particular model, you'll get a B which might reflect the true status better.

     

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Season of Sharing Community Challenge Launch!

Jump in, show your community spirit, and win prizes!

Kudos to our 2025 Community Spotlight Honorees

Expanding mentorship, skilling, and AI innovation

Congratulations to the May Top 10 Community Leaders!

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Power Apps

#1
Valantis Profile Picture

Valantis 463

#2
WarrenBelz Profile Picture

WarrenBelz 364 Most Valuable Professional

#3
11manish Profile Picture

11manish 275

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard