web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Power Platform Community / Forums / Power Automate / Request generation wit...
Power Automate
Unanswered

Request generation with numerical property name

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by

Hello everyone,

 

I'm trying to create a connector to create an issue in Redmine. But i'm facing the following problem.

 

The issue in Redmine has custom fields which can be defined in the API request using the property "custom_field_values" by passing the list of custom fields id as property name and the corresponding value to affect.

 

Format expected by Redmine for the "custom_field_values"

 

"custom_field_values": {
 "3": "value of field 3",
 "4": "value of field 4"
}

 

 

But, when the request body is generated by Power Automate, the "custom_field_values" property contains an array with a number of values corresponding to the max of the custom field ids and all values are set with 'null' excepted for each indices corresponding to each  custom field ids which have the correct value to affect. 

 

Format generated for the "custom_field_values" 

 

"custom_field_values": [
 null,
 null,
 null,
 "Value of field 3",
 "value of field 4"
],

 

 

This behaviour seems to be due to the fact that the property name of each custom field is numerical.

What should I correct in the connector in order to obtain the request body expected by Redmine ?

 

Here is the corresponding swagger code:

 

swagger: '2.0'
info: {title: Redmine_connector, description: '', version: '1.0'}
host: redmine_url
basePath: /
schemes: [https]
consumes: []
produces: []
paths:
 /issues.json:
 post:
 responses:
 default:
 description: default
 schema: {}
 summary: Redmine connector
 description: Create an issue in Redmine
 operationId: Redmine_connector
 parameters:
 - name: body
 in: body
 required: false
 schema:
 type: object
 properties:
 issue:
 type: object
 properties:
 is_private: {type: string, description: is_private}
 project_id: {type: string, description: project_id}
 tracker_id: {type: string, description: tracker_id}
 subject: {type: string, description: subject}
 description: {type: string, description: description}
 status_id: {type: string, description: status_id}
 priority_id: {type: string, description: priority_id}
 assigned_to_id: {type: string, description: assigned_to_id}
 custom_field_values:
 type: object
 properties:
 '3': {type: string, description: '3'}
 '4': {type: string, description: '4'}
 description: custom_field_values
 notes: {type: string, description: notes}
 description: issue
definitions: {}
parameters: {}
responses: {}
securityDefinitions:
 API_key: {type: apiKey, in: header, name: X-Redmine-API-Key}
security:
- API_key: []
tags: []

 

 

Example of full request body expected by Redmine

 

{
 "issue": {
 "is_private": "0",
 "project_id": "myProject",
 "tracker_id": "41",
 "subject": "Test Redmine issue creation",
 "description": "test decription",
 "status_id": "26",
 "priority_id": "2",
 "assigned_to_id": "1234",
 "custom_field_values": 	{
 		"3": "Client_entity"
 	},
 "notes": "test3"
 }
}

 

 

Thank you.

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • murshed Profile Picture
    Microsoft Employee on at

    "But, when the request body is generated by Power Automate, the "custom_field_values" property contains an array with a number of values corresponding to the max of the custom field ids"

     

    Can you please explain little more what you mean by "max of custom field ids"? If this is an object as you defined in the code you posted above there should not be a max. I am assuming you are constructing it as an array in some way and passing on the value. You are expecting that value to be a JSON object since it is defined as such in the schema, but the array was returned. Please correct me if I am wrong. You will need to use compose operation to construct a JSON.

    If this reply answers your question or solves your issue, please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION ☑️. If you find this reply helpful, please consider giving it a LIKE 👍.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Users!

Kudos to our 2025 Community Spotlight Honorees

Congratulations to our 2025 community superstars!

Leaderboard > Power Automate

#1
David_MA Profile Picture

David_MA 250 Super User 2026 Season 1

#2
Expiscornovus Profile Picture

Expiscornovus 222 Most Valuable Professional

#3
Haque Profile Picture

Haque 174

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard