Unanswered

Combine array of objects with common keys

(0) Share

Report

Posted on by cmilanelo

Let's say I have two arrays of objects:

[
 {
 "key": "a",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "key": "b",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "key": "c",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 }
]

and

[
 {
 "key": "b",
 "value": [8,9]
 },
 {
 "key": "d",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "key": "a",
 "value": [4,5]
 },
 {
 "key": "e",
 "value": [3,4,5]
 }
]

Is there any ~~painless~~ way to combine both arrays keeping all the keys and merging the values?

The result could be either

[
 {
 "key": "a",
 "value": [1,2,3,4,5]
 },
 {
 "key": "b",
 "value": [1,2,3,8,9]
 },
 {
 "key": "c",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "key": "d",
 "value": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "key": "e",
 "value": [3,4,5]
 }
]

[
 {
 "a": [1,2,3,4,5]
 },
 {
 "b": [1,2,3,8,9]
 },
 {
 "c": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "d": [1,2,3]
 },
 {
 "e": [3,4,5]
 }
]

Thank you!

Categories:

Building flows

I have the same question (0)

All responses (11)

Answers (1)

Paulie78 8,422 Moderator on at

Like (1)

Report
Certainly is possible. I've produced the output in both ways you demonstrated above:

If you would rather not recreate this, you can simply copy this code into a flow and it will create the demo for you:

{"id":"83f219a9-d493-42b7-85f4-a47c-3ef98454","brandColor":"#8C3900","connectionReferences":{},"connectorDisplayName":"Control","icon":"data&colon;image/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMzIiIGhlaWdodD0iMzIiIHZlcnNpb249IjEuMSIgdmlld0JveD0iMCAwIDMyIDMyIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPg0KIDxwYXRoIGQ9Im0wIDBoMzJ2MzJoLTMyeiIgZmlsbD0iIzhDMzkwMCIvPg0KIDxwYXRoIGQ9Im04IDEwaDE2djEyaC0xNnptMTUgMTF2LTEwaC0xNHYxMHptLTItOHY2aC0xMHYtNnptLTEgNXYtNGgtOHY0eiIgZmlsbD0iI2ZmZiIvPg0KPC9zdmc+DQo=","isTrigger":false,"operationName":"Combine_Arrays","operationDefinition":{"type":"Scope","actions":{"Array1":{"type":"Compose","inputs":[{"key":"a","value":[1,2,3]},{"key":"b","value":[1,2,3]},{"key":"c","value":[1,2,3]}],"runAfter":{}},"Array2":{"type":"Compose","inputs":[{"key":"a","value":[4,5]},{"key":"b","value":[8,9]},{"key":"d","value":[1,2,3]}],"runAfter":{"Array1":["Succeeded"]}},"Select":{"type":"Select","inputs":{"from":"@range(0,length(outputs('Array1')))","select":{"key":"@outputs('Array1')[item()]['key']","value":"@union(outputs('Array1')[item()]['value'], outputs('Array2')[item()]['value'])"}},"runAfter":{"Array2":["Succeeded"]}},"Select_2":{"type":"Select","inputs":{"from":"@range(0, length(outputs('Array1')))","select":{"@{outputs('Array1')[item()]['key']}":"@union(outputs('Array1')[item()]['value'], outputs('Array2')[item()]['value'])"}},"runAfter":{"Select":["Succeeded"]}}},"runAfter":{}}}

Copy the code above into your clipboard, and then add a new step in a flow, go to "My clipboard" and click on "Combine Arrays".

Let me know how you get on.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
cmilanelo 31 on at

Like (0)

Report

That's a very elegant/comprehensive/efficient solution, but it misses the extra key "d" and "e" present in the second array.

The two original arrays will contain "keys" that are both common and unique among them. The common ones must be merged, and the unique ones (from both) must be kept.

Also, the number of keys will not be the same nor in the same order, so I don't think using index will be possible in this case (I edited the original question to make it more clear).

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
cmilanelo 31 on at

Like (0)

Report
In addition to my previous answer, I just would like to add that the inputs array could be in the format below, if it's any easier:
[ { "a": [1,2,3] }, { "b": [1,2,3] }, { "c": [1,2,3] } ]
[ { "b": [8,9] }, { "d": [1,2,3] }, { "a": [4,5] }, { "e": [3,4,5] } ]

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Paulie78 8,422 Moderator on at

Like (0)

Report

**bleep**, so it does. In that case, the answer to your question, is there is not a painless way, but there is a way, but involves an apply to each loop. Do you want me to put it together for you?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
cmilanelo 31 on at

Like (0)

Report

@Paulie78, I appreciate your help.
Let me play around and I'll let you know if I need your brain.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Verified answer

Paulie78 8,422 Moderator on at

Like (1)

Report
Was an interesting question, this does what you want, copy and paste again:

{"id":"cec54acd-d2f5-4d1c-8b4a-b094-60172b38","brandColor":"#8C3900","connectionReferences":{},"connectorDisplayName":"Control","icon":"data&colon;image/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMzIiIGhlaWdodD0iMzIiIHZlcnNpb249IjEuMSIgdmlld0JveD0iMCAwIDMyIDMyIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPg0KIDxwYXRoIGQ9Im0wIDBoMzJ2MzJoLTMyeiIgZmlsbD0iIzhDMzkwMCIvPg0KIDxwYXRoIGQ9Im04IDEwaDE2djEyaC0xNnptMTUgMTF2LTEwaC0xNHYxMHptLTItOHY2aC0xMHYtNnptLTEgNXYtNGgtOHY0eiIgZmlsbD0iI2ZmZiIvPg0KPC9zdmc+DQo=","isTrigger":false,"operationName":"Combine_Arrays","operationDefinition":{"type":"Scope","actions":{"Array1":{"type":"Compose","inputs":[{"key":"a","value":[1,2,3]},{"key":"b","value":[1,2,3]},{"key":"c","value":[1,2,3]}],"runAfter":{}},"Array2":{"type":"Compose","inputs":[{"key":"a","value":[4,5]},{"key":"b","value":[8,9]},{"key":"d","value":[1,2,3]}],"runAfter":{"Array1":["Succeeded"]}},"keyValues":{"type":"Select","inputs":{"from":"@union(outputs('Array1'), outputs('Array2'))","select":"@item()['key']"},"runAfter":{"Array2":["Succeeded"]}},"Unique_Keys":{"type":"Compose","inputs":"@union(body('keyValues'),body('keyValues'))","runAfter":{"keyValues":["Succeeded"]}},"eachKey":{"type":"Foreach","foreach":"@outputs('Unique_Keys')","actions":{"filterArray2":{"type":"Query","inputs":{"from":"@outputs('Array2')","where":"@equals(item()['key'], outputs('CurrentKey'))"},"runAfter":{"array1Values":["Succeeded"]}},"CurrentKey":{"type":"Compose","inputs":"@item()","runAfter":{}},"filterArray1":{"type":"Query","inputs":{"from":"@outputs('Array1')","where":"@equals(item()['key'], outputs('CurrentKey'))"},"runAfter":{"CurrentKey":["Succeeded"]}},"Combined":{"type":"Compose","inputs":{"key":"@{outputs('CurrentKey')}","value":"@union\r\n(\r\nif(equals(outputs('array1Values'), null), outputs('EmptyArray'), outputs('array1Values')),\r\nif(equals(outputs('array2Values'), null), outputs('EmptyArray'), outputs('array2Values'))\r\n)"},"runAfter":{"array2Values":["Succeeded"]}},"array1Values":{"type":"Compose","inputs":"@first(body('filterArray1'))?['value']","runAfter":{"filterArray1":["Succeeded"]}},"array2Values":{"type":"Compose","inputs":"@first(body('filterArray2'))?['value']","runAfter":{"filterArray2":["Succeeded"]}}},"runAfter":{"EmptyArray":["Succeeded"]}},"EmptyArray":{"type":"Compose","inputs":[],"runAfter":{"Unique_Keys":["Succeeded"]}},"newArray":{"type":"Compose","inputs":"@outputs('Combined')","runAfter":{"eachKey":["Succeeded"]}}},"runAfter":{}}}

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
cmilanelo 31 on at

Like (0)

Report

@Paulie78 you're sick! 😊

That worked like a charm.
Thank you so much!

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
cmilanelo 31 on at

Like (0)

Report

@Paulie78, your solution works perfectly, and in addition, it contains a new concept for me.

On the last step inside the eachKey loop, the step "Combined" creates the object with the key/values, and outside the loop (step newArray) contains all of them together afterwards.

How come the "newArray" gathers all the data? Isn't the value of "Combined" overwritten on every loop?
In any coding language, I'd expect the "newArray" to contain only the result of the last interaction.

Could you please give me some background or source for this concept?

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
Paulie78 8,422 Moderator on at

Like (1)

Report

The value of combined comes out as an array of values, which end up in newArray. Lots of of the actions in your apply to each loop will be doing the same.

Was this reply helpful? Yes No
nichlas 2 on at

Like (0)

Report

nvm I found it!

Was this reply helpful? Yes No