web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Power Platform Community / Forums / Power Apps / Power automate adds UR...
Power Apps
Unanswered

Power automate adds URI encoding to concatenated string on its own

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by

I was adjusting a previously tested power automate cloud flow. At a certain point I concatenate multiple strings.

I added some steps AFTER the concatenation.

PeterKo_0-1693994120583.png

 

The result concatenated string somehow changed to URI encoded, after the flow edit. I checked the concat function,

PeterKo_1-1693994176974.png

here is the entire concat function : concat(outputs('Get_item')?['body/RecID'],'_',outputs('Get_item')?['body/TitleOrigin'])

 

I checked the inputs, recreated the concatenation with a new variable - the result string for a new variable was NOT URI encoded, which is correct.

 

To my disbelief, it seems that power automate somehow added the URI encoding on his own and didnt show in the expression window, it showed with Peek code:

PeterKo_3-1693994600017.png

 

so my question pretty much is - "what the frick???" is there any way power automate could have added this encoding on his own, in regard to an operation added AFTER the concatenation itself???

I did ad an encode and decode URI component expression further in some flow steps, but certainly not this one...

 

Thank you kindly for any explanation.

Categories:
I have the same question (0)
  • MiDer Profile Picture
    139 on at

    @PeterKo ,

    might just be a shot into the sky....
    Technically each and every connector action respectively trigger is based on certain HTTP actions.
    We just get a look on a nicely wrapped present.

    Personally, even though I`d somehow expect a concatenate to cast the input as data type string, your example originates from a HTTP get post against SharePoint.
    It might slip through any interpreter that you do not intend to pass it along further on other potential HTTP methods (or it has been just a bump on the road of some Intellisense within the browser...have not tried to reproduce this).
    How about putting the value into a compose action first? Worst thing that presumably could happen is getting an array in return under specific conditions.

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Users!

Kudos to our 2025 Community Spotlight Honorees

Congratulations to our 2025 community superstars!

Congratulations to the April Top 10 Community Leaders!

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Power Apps

#1
Vish WR Profile Picture

Vish WR 893

#2
Valantis Profile Picture

Valantis 571

#3
11manish Profile Picture

11manish 482

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard