web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Skip to main content

Announcements

News and Announcements icon
Community site session details

Community site session details

Session Id :
Power Platform Community / Forums / Power Apps / Configuration Migratio...
Power Apps
Unanswered

Configuration Migration Tool schema with 1:M relationship

(0) ShareShare
ReportReport
Posted on by 25

I am using the Configuration Migration Tool to create a schema for data import. I want to pull the data set with a 1:M relationship. But I couldn't find the option to add the 1:m relations. The Import setting is showing N:N, the one I am looking for is not showing. 

I try to add it liek this ( see below), but when running in the pipeline, it fail to recongnize the link-entity, and the filter on the link-entity. Any suggestions?

<entity name="customdialogconfigstep" displayname="Custom Dialog Config Step" etc="10157" primaryidfield="customdialogconfigstepid" primarynamefield="name" disableplugins="true">
<fields>
<field displayname="Config" name="configData" type="string" customfield="true" />
</fields>
<link-entity name="customdialogconfig" from="customdialogconfigid" to="customdialogconfig" link-type="inner">
&lt;filter&gt;
&lt;condition attribute="app" operator="eq" value="Test" /&gt;
&lt;/filter&gt;
</link-entity>
</entity>

I have the same question (0)
  • AllanDeCastro Profile Picture
    412 Most Valuable Professional on at

    Hello,

    Can you first try testing your fetch using XrmToolBox or generate it from the Advanced Find (including your filter) ?
    Not sure that the UI of CMT support the 1:M relation but the engine behind can maybe works.


  • EagleCa Profile Picture
    25 on at

    Hi @AllanDeCastro Thanks for getting back to me. Yes, the query tested in XrmToolBox fetch build, and it works. When running in the pipeline, it failed at the Schema validation, couldn't recognize the linked-entity. The pipeline use MSCRMExportCMData@12 

  • AllanDeCastro Profile Picture
    412 Most Valuable Professional on at

    Ah, I think you're right, there may be a schema validation that doesn't implement this specificity 😕

Under review

Thank you for your reply! To ensure a great experience for everyone, your content is awaiting approval by our Community Managers. Please check back later.

Helpful resources

Quick Links

Introducing the 2026 Season 1 community Super Users

Congratulations to our 2026 Super Users!

Kudos to our 2025 Community Spotlight Honorees

Congratulations to our 2025 community superstars!

Congratulations to the March Top 10 Community Leaders!

These are the community rock stars!

Leaderboard > Power Apps

#1
11manish Profile Picture

11manish 530

#2
WarrenBelz Profile Picture

WarrenBelz 459 Most Valuable Professional

#3
Haque Profile Picture

Haque 314

Last 30 days Overall leaderboard